Evidence and interpretation
A claim needs a source that supports it. We distinguish a study's findings from the interpretation of those findings, and identify the population and methods when they matter to the conclusion. Educational examples are labelled as examples.
The scientific guides on this website introduce subjects and reading methods. External guidelines, tools and publications remain the work of their named publishers. A link is a route to that work, not an ENS certification or a claim of authorship.
Interests and independence
When proposing content or collaboration, describe financial, professional or other relationships that could influence how the work is understood. Explain the relationship itself: for example, who funds a project or whether a contributor has a relevant advisory role.
Such information helps readers evaluate a contribution. It should accompany the material it concerns, rather than being hidden in an unrelated general statement. Permission to use an organisation's name or logo is a separate question and should be agreed explicitly.
Corrections and concerns
If a source is misrepresented, a link is out of date or an explanation needs correction, send the page address and the passage concerned. Include the original source and explain the change you think is needed. A specific, documented concern is easier to assess than a general objection.